Ahmedabad
Heat context: Description: Hot inland setting; seasonal humidity changes require local assessment. Night heat: Include overnight indoor and outdoor measurements in local assessment; no comparable current city-wide indoor/night exposure series verified here. Trend note: Use national/district and local-plan evidence at its stated scale; no comparable current municipal time-series trend estimate is reproduced here. Climate description basis: Broad contextual description, not a formal climate-zone classification; seasonal conditions need local validation.
Plans: Verified description: Ahmedabad HAP collaboration and retrospective research verified; current signed 2026 plan/version not retrieved. Legal status: Administrative/policy or state health planning instrument as described; plan publication is not proof every action is legally enforceable. Implementation verified: false
Warning system: Source: IMD plus state/district/municipal dissemination arrangements Last mile reach: Not verified; test radio, local-language announcements, worker groups and door-to-door routes as proposed design, not existing universal coverage.
Rules for heat at work: Local order verified: false Note: Obtain current state/sector orders, jurisdiction and wage/rest terms; do not import a different state’s timetable.
Cooling and buildings: Note: Check actual state/local notifications, building ownership and retrofit permissions before specifying compliance.
Money for protection: Local allocations or releases verified: false Note: Screen eligible project costs separately from staffing, electricity and upkeep; budget route is not a grant offer.
Country code: IN
State or ut: Gujarat
Selection basis: Documented heat-health action and observational programme research.
Responsible actor ids:
Proposed collaboration: Interpretation: Pair ward housing/work protection with accountable warnings and mortality analysis.
Evidence gaps:
- Current shelter/roof coverage, tenant inclusion and recurrent costs not verified.
- No common national municipality-level exposure ranking verified.
Evidence:
Delhi
Heat context: Description: Strong pre-monsoon daytime heat, with changing humidity during the season. Night heat: Include overnight indoor and outdoor measurements in local assessment; no comparable current city-wide indoor/night exposure series verified here. Trend note: Use national/district and local-plan evidence at its stated scale; no comparable current municipal time-series trend estimate is reproduced here. Climate description basis: Broad contextual description, not a formal climate-zone classification; seasonal conditions need local validation.
Plans: Verified description: Delhi HAP 2025 verified in DDMA register; Delhi NCT is not synonymous with NDMC or the wider NCR. Legal status: Administrative/policy or state health planning instrument as described; plan publication is not proof every action is legally enforceable. Implementation verified: false
Warning system: Source: IMD plus state/district/municipal dissemination arrangements Last mile reach: Not verified; test radio, local-language announcements, worker groups and door-to-door routes as proposed design, not existing universal coverage.
Rules for heat at work: Local order verified: false Note: Obtain current state/sector orders, jurisdiction and wage/rest terms; do not import a different state’s timetable.
Cooling and buildings: Note: Check actual state/local notifications, building ownership and retrofit permissions before specifying compliance.
Money for protection: Local allocations or releases verified: false Note: Screen eligible project costs separately from staffing, electricity and upkeep; budget route is not a grant offer.
Country code: IN
State or ut: National Capital Territory of Delhi
Selection basis: Official UT heat plan and national district-risk evidence.
Responsible actor ids:
Proposed collaboration: Interpretation: Pilot an action-owner-budget register across one district and worker setting.
Evidence gaps:
- Current department compliance and service reach not independently verified.
- No common national municipality-level exposure ranking verified.
Evidence:
Nagpur
Heat context: Description: Hot inland summer setting; seasonal transition matters for cooling design. Night heat: Include overnight indoor and outdoor measurements in local assessment; no comparable current city-wide indoor/night exposure series verified here. Trend note: Use national/district and local-plan evidence at its stated scale; no comparable current municipal time-series trend estimate is reproduced here. Climate description basis: Broad contextual description, not a formal climate-zone classification; seasonal conditions need local validation.
Plans: Verified description: 2021 city climate plan describes 2019 heat actions; no current signed 2026 municipal HAP retrieved. Legal status: Administrative/policy or state health planning instrument as described; plan publication is not proof every action is legally enforceable. Implementation verified: false
Warning system: Source: IMD plus state/district/municipal dissemination arrangements Last mile reach: Not verified; test radio, local-language announcements, worker groups and door-to-door routes as proposed design, not existing universal coverage.
Rules for heat at work: Local order verified: false Note: Obtain current state/sector orders, jurisdiction and wage/rest terms; do not import a different state’s timetable.
Cooling and buildings: Note: Check actual state/local notifications, building ownership and retrofit permissions before specifying compliance.
Money for protection: Local allocations or releases verified: false Note: Screen eligible project costs separately from staffing, electricity and upkeep; budget route is not a grant offer.
Country code: IN
State or ut: Maharashtra
Selection basis: City climate plan documents heat stress and historical HAP activities.
Responsible actor ids:
Proposed collaboration: Interpretation: Update shelter/water inventory and add operating/maintenance duties before the next hot season.
Evidence gaps:
- Historical counts cannot be reused as a current service directory.
- No common national municipality-level exposure ranking verified.
Evidence:
Hyderabad
Heat context: Description: Hot inland Deccan setting; dry-season conditions cannot safely be assumed year-round. Night heat: Include overnight indoor and outdoor measurements in local assessment; no comparable current city-wide indoor/night exposure series verified here. Trend note: Use national/district and local-plan evidence at its stated scale; no comparable current municipal time-series trend estimate is reproduced here. Climate description basis: Broad contextual description, not a formal climate-zone classification; seasonal conditions need local validation.
Plans: Verified description: State cool-roof policy 2023–2028 verified; current city HAP not retrieved. Legal status: Administrative/policy or state health planning instrument as described; plan publication is not proof every action is legally enforceable. Implementation verified: false
Warning system: Source: IMD plus state/district/municipal dissemination arrangements Last mile reach: Not verified; test radio, local-language announcements, worker groups and door-to-door routes as proposed design, not existing universal coverage.
Rules for heat at work: Local order verified: false Note: Obtain current state/sector orders, jurisdiction and wage/rest terms; do not import a different state’s timetable.
Cooling and buildings: Note: Check actual state/local notifications, building ownership and retrofit permissions before specifying compliance.
Money for protection: Local allocations or releases verified: false Note: Screen eligible project costs separately from staffing, electricity and upkeep; budget route is not a grant offer.
Country code: IN
State or ut: Telangana
Selection basis: Official cool-roof policy describes Hyderabad pilot activity.
Responsible actor ids:
Proposed collaboration: Interpretation: Design a tenant-inclusive roof retrofit with measured indoor results and a recoating budget.
Evidence gaps:
- Exact current mandatory scope, installation quality and achieved coverage need checking.
- No common national municipality-level exposure ranking verified.
Evidence:
Chennai
Heat context: Description: Humid coastal heat: local plan examines heat, humidity and urban form. Night heat: Include overnight indoor and outdoor measurements in local assessment; no comparable current city-wide indoor/night exposure series verified here. Trend note: Use national/district and local-plan evidence at its stated scale; no comparable current municipal time-series trend estimate is reproduced here. Climate description basis: Broad contextual description, not a formal climate-zone classification; seasonal conditions need local validation.
Plans: Verified description: Chennai HAP 2025 and Tamil Nadu State HAP 2026 verified; GCC action geography cannot fairly be conflated with the entire metropolitan region. Legal status: Administrative/policy or state health planning instrument as described; plan publication is not proof every action is legally enforceable. Implementation verified: false
Warning system: Source: IMD plus state/district/municipal dissemination arrangements Last mile reach: Not verified; test radio, local-language announcements, worker groups and door-to-door routes as proposed design, not existing universal coverage.
Rules for heat at work: Local order verified: false Note: Obtain current state/sector orders, jurisdiction and wage/rest terms; do not import a different state’s timetable.
Cooling and buildings: Note: Check actual state/local notifications, building ownership and retrofit permissions before specifying compliance.
Money for protection: Local allocations or releases verified: false Note: Screen eligible project costs separately from staffing, electricity and upkeep; budget route is not a grant offer.
Country code: IN
State or ut: Tamil Nadu
Selection basis: 2025 city plan has ward-risk analysis and sits within 2026 state framework.
Responsible actor ids:
Proposed collaboration: Interpretation: Connect ward risk to clinics, home-based workers, school readiness and explicit owners/payments.
Evidence gaps:
- Indicative financing is not a sanctioned city heat budget.
- No common national municipality-level exposure ranking verified.
Evidence:
Mumbai
Heat context: Description: Humid coastal setting with heat retained in dense built areas. Night heat: Include overnight indoor and outdoor measurements in local assessment; no comparable current city-wide indoor/night exposure series verified here. Trend note: Use national/district and local-plan evidence at its stated scale; no comparable current municipal time-series trend estimate is reproduced here. Climate description basis: Broad contextual description, not a formal climate-zone classification; seasonal conditions need local validation.
Plans: Verified description: BMC heat-risk pathway and climate-budgeting note verified; stand-alone current municipal HAP not retrieved. Legal status: Administrative/policy or state health planning instrument as described; plan publication is not proof every action is legally enforceable. Implementation verified: false
Warning system: Source: IMD plus state/district/municipal dissemination arrangements Last mile reach: Not verified; test radio, local-language announcements, worker groups and door-to-door routes as proposed design, not existing universal coverage.
Rules for heat at work: Local order verified: false Note: Obtain current state/sector orders, jurisdiction and wage/rest terms; do not import a different state’s timetable.
Cooling and buildings: Note: Check actual state/local notifications, building ownership and retrofit permissions before specifying compliance.
Money for protection: Local allocations or releases verified: false Note: Screen eligible project costs separately from staffing, electricity and upkeep; budget route is not a grant offer.
Country code: IN
State or ut: Maharashtra
Selection basis: BMC building heat-risk analysis and climate-budget work.
Responsible actor ids:
Proposed collaboration: Interpretation: Turn one hotspot’s building proposals into a costed, maintainable public/low-income retrofit package.
Evidence gaps:
- Surface heat does not establish indoor exposure or clinical benefit; climate-tagged budgets need component-level checking.
- No common national municipality-level exposure ranking verified.
Evidence:
Kolkata
Heat context: Description: Humid urban heat; state health plan discusses Kolkata’s urban heat island. Night heat: Include overnight indoor and outdoor measurements in local assessment; no comparable current city-wide indoor/night exposure series verified here. Trend note: Use national/district and local-plan evidence at its stated scale; no comparable current municipal time-series trend estimate is reproduced here. Climate description basis: Broad contextual description, not a formal climate-zone classification; seasonal conditions need local validation.
Plans: Verified description: West Bengal climate-health plan verified; separate current Kolkata municipal HAP not verified. Legal status: Administrative/policy or state health planning instrument as described; plan publication is not proof every action is legally enforceable. Implementation verified: false
Warning system: Source: IMD plus state/district/municipal dissemination arrangements Last mile reach: Not verified; test radio, local-language announcements, worker groups and door-to-door routes as proposed design, not existing universal coverage.
Rules for heat at work: Local order verified: false Note: Obtain current state/sector orders, jurisdiction and wage/rest terms; do not import a different state’s timetable.
Cooling and buildings: Note: Check actual state/local notifications, building ownership and retrofit permissions before specifying compliance.
Money for protection: Local allocations or releases verified: false Note: Screen eligible project costs separately from staffing, electricity and upkeep; budget route is not a grant offer.
Country code: IN
State or ut: West Bengal
Selection basis: Heat chapter specifically discusses Kolkata; not a national exposure rank.
Responsible actor ids:
Proposed collaboration: Interpretation: Explore a health-led ward partnership addressing humid/night heat and people isolated at home.
Evidence gaps:
- Current city lead, funded action plan and household reach need confirmation.
- No common national municipality-level exposure ranking verified.
Evidence:
Bhubaneswar
Heat context: Description: Hot eastern city; humid conditions and seasonal transitions would ideally enter local assessment. Night heat: Include overnight indoor and outdoor measurements in local assessment; no comparable current city-wide indoor/night exposure series verified here. Trend note: Use national/district and local-plan evidence at its stated scale; no comparable current municipal time-series trend estimate is reproduced here. Climate description basis: Broad contextual description, not a formal climate-zone classification; seasonal conditions need local validation.
Plans: Verified description: Odisha 2022–2027 climate-health plan verified; current separate city HAP not retrieved. Legal status: Administrative/policy or state health planning instrument as described; plan publication is not proof every action is legally enforceable. Implementation verified: false
Warning system: Source: IMD plus state/district/municipal dissemination arrangements Last mile reach: Not verified; test radio, local-language announcements, worker groups and door-to-door routes as proposed design, not existing universal coverage.
Rules for heat at work: Local order verified: false Note: Obtain current state/sector orders, jurisdiction and wage/rest terms; do not import a different state’s timetable.
Cooling and buildings: Note: Check actual state/local notifications, building ownership and retrofit permissions before specifying compliance.
Money for protection: Local allocations or releases verified: false Note: Screen eligible project costs separately from staffing, electricity and upkeep; budget route is not a grant offer.
Country code: IN
State or ut: Odisha
Selection basis: Listed among heat-prone places in Odisha’s state climate-health plan.
Responsible actor ids:
Proposed collaboration: Interpretation: Link facility readiness and local heat alerts with labour/community feedback in a defined ward.
Evidence gaps:
- Current municipal roles, labour circulars and implementation expenditures need local verification.
- No common national municipality-level exposure ranking verified.
Evidence: