Manila
Heat context: Humid tropical heat with seasonal/local variation; indoor, night and worksite conditions need local measurements.
Official heat plan: Detail: A final adopted city heat action plan, legal instrument and itemised recurring budget were not verified in this review. This does not establish absence.
Agencies responsible: Mandated route: City/LGU DRRM planning arrangements under RA 10121, plus health, schools, planning/engineering, utilities and employers within their own mandates. Local delivery limit: Specific local commitments outside the documented examples are proposed routes, not verified operational assignments. Republic Act 10121, disaster management law (opens in a new tab) ↗
Warnings: Verified national route: PAGASA heat-index information and DOST-described iHeatMAP. Local protocol: Local thresholds, offline channels, current duty roster and financed protective actions not verified. DOST iHeatMAP service explanation (opens in a new tab) ↗
Rules for heat at work: National reference: RA 11058 for covered private-sector workplaces; verify current advisory text and applicability before using operational rules. City specific rule: Not verified Republic Act 11058, occupational safety and health (opens in a new tab) ↗ · PMAP circulation of DOLE signed advisory 20-2026 (opens in a new tab) ↗
Cooling and buildings: National reference: Philippine Green Building Code applies to qualifying buildings; local permit and current appliance requirements require checking. City specific requirements: Not verified Philippine Green Building Code 2015 original document via ADB (opens in a new tab) ↗
Money for protection: Potential routes: Approved LGU budgets and eligible adaptation project routes, subject to legal/appraisal conditions; no heat earmark inferred. CCC People’s Survival Fund (opens in a new tab) ↗ · DILG 2026 legal opinion on LDRRMF purposes (opens in a new tab) ↗
Costs: Currency: PHP Note: No comparable local lifecycle cost quote verified. No USD or FX conversion is invented; a fund envelope is not a unit intervention cost.
Gaps in what we found:
- Historical index; not current heat-index or indoor measurements.
- Neighbourhood indoor/night exposure, disability access, wage protection and recurring maintenance cost require verification.
Known, inferred, uncertain: Known: The 2020 national analysis classified Manila’s historical population-exposure index very high. Inferred: The proposed entry point follows from the documented exposure/response evidence. Uncertain: Current operational readiness, effects, local adoption, reach and costs.
Region: National Capital Region
Selection basis: The 2020 national analysis classified Manila’s historical population-exposure index very high.
Selection not a rank: true
Evidence:
Proposed collaboration entry: Dense-city assessment, including indoor/night exposure and accessible shade, is a proposed entry point.
Caloocan
Heat context: Humid tropical heat with seasonal/local variation; indoor, night and worksite conditions need local measurements.
Official heat plan: Detail: A final adopted city heat action plan, legal instrument and itemised recurring budget were not verified in this review. This does not establish absence.
Agencies responsible: Mandated route: City/LGU DRRM planning arrangements under RA 10121, plus health, schools, planning/engineering, utilities and employers within their own mandates. Local delivery limit: Specific local commitments outside the documented examples are proposed routes, not verified operational assignments. Republic Act 10121, disaster management law (opens in a new tab) ↗
Warnings: Verified national route: PAGASA heat-index information and DOST-described iHeatMAP. Local protocol: Local thresholds, offline channels, current duty roster and financed protective actions not verified. DOST iHeatMAP service explanation (opens in a new tab) ↗
Rules for heat at work: National reference: RA 11058 for covered private-sector workplaces; verify current advisory text and applicability before using operational rules. City specific rule: Not verified Republic Act 11058, occupational safety and health (opens in a new tab) ↗ · PMAP circulation of DOLE signed advisory 20-2026 (opens in a new tab) ↗
Cooling and buildings: National reference: Philippine Green Building Code applies to qualifying buildings; local permit and current appliance requirements require checking. City specific requirements: Not verified Philippine Green Building Code 2015 original document via ADB (opens in a new tab) ↗
Money for protection: Potential routes: Approved LGU budgets and eligible adaptation project routes, subject to legal/appraisal conditions; no heat earmark inferred. CCC People’s Survival Fund (opens in a new tab) ↗ · DILG 2026 legal opinion on LDRRMF purposes (opens in a new tab) ↗
Costs: Currency: PHP Note: No comparable local lifecycle cost quote verified. No USD or FX conversion is invented; a fund envelope is not a unit intervention cost.
Gaps in what we found:
- Historical exposure category is density-based; current local programme implementation not verified.
- Neighbourhood indoor/night exposure, disability access, wage protection and recurring maintenance cost require verification.
Known, inferred, uncertain: Known: The same study classified Caloocan’s historical population-exposure index high. Inferred: The proposed entry point follows from the documented exposure/response evidence. Uncertain: Current operational readiness, effects, local adoption, reach and costs.
Region: National Capital Region
Selection basis: The same study classified Caloocan’s historical population-exposure index high.
Selection not a rank: true
Evidence:
Proposed collaboration entry: Investigate neighbourhood and worker/housing protection with the LGU and community representatives.
Mandaluyong
Heat context: Humid tropical heat with seasonal/local variation; indoor, night and worksite conditions need local measurements.
Official heat plan: Detail: A final adopted city heat action plan, legal instrument and itemised recurring budget were not verified in this review. This does not establish absence.
Agencies responsible: Mandated route: City/LGU DRRM planning arrangements under RA 10121, plus health, schools, planning/engineering, utilities and employers within their own mandates. Local delivery limit: Specific local commitments outside the documented examples are proposed routes, not verified operational assignments. Republic Act 10121, disaster management law (opens in a new tab) ↗
Warnings: Verified national route: PAGASA heat-index information and DOST-described iHeatMAP. Local protocol: Local thresholds, offline channels, current duty roster and financed protective actions not verified. DOST iHeatMAP service explanation (opens in a new tab) ↗
Rules for heat at work: National reference: RA 11058 for covered private-sector workplaces; verify current advisory text and applicability before using operational rules. City specific rule: Not verified Republic Act 11058, occupational safety and health (opens in a new tab) ↗ · PMAP circulation of DOLE signed advisory 20-2026 (opens in a new tab) ↗
Cooling and buildings: National reference: Philippine Green Building Code applies to qualifying buildings; local permit and current appliance requirements require checking. City specific requirements: Not verified Philippine Green Building Code 2015 original document via ADB (opens in a new tab) ↗
Money for protection: Potential routes: Approved LGU budgets and eligible adaptation project routes, subject to legal/appraisal conditions; no heat earmark inferred. CCC People’s Survival Fund (opens in a new tab) ↗ · DILG 2026 legal opinion on LDRRMF purposes (opens in a new tab) ↗
Costs: Currency: PHP Note: No comparable local lifecycle cost quote verified. No USD or FX conversion is invented; a fund envelope is not a unit intervention cost.
Gaps in what we found:
- Historical index cannot determine 2026 individual or worksite risk.
- Neighbourhood indoor/night exposure, disability access, wage protection and recurring maintenance cost require verification.
Known, inferred, uncertain: Known: The same study classified Mandaluyong’s historical population-exposure index high. Inferred: The proposed entry point follows from the documented exposure/response evidence. Uncertain: Current operational readiness, effects, local adoption, reach and costs.
Region: National Capital Region
Selection basis: The same study classified Mandaluyong’s historical population-exposure index high.
Selection not a rank: true
Evidence:
Proposed collaboration entry: Investigate tenant/worker needs and publicly accessible protection across neighbourhood boundaries.
Quezon City
Heat context: Humid tropical heat with seasonal/local variation; indoor, night and worksite conditions need local measurements.
Official heat plan: Detail: June 2026 city account describes the Heat Action Team and comprehensive plan development. Quezon City Heat Action Team (opens in a new tab) ↗
Agencies responsible: Mandated route: City/LGU DRRM planning arrangements under RA 10121, plus health, schools, planning/engineering, utilities and employers within their own mandates. Local delivery limit: Specific local commitments outside the documented examples are proposed routes, not verified operational assignments. Republic Act 10121, disaster management law (opens in a new tab) ↗
Warnings: Verified national route: PAGASA heat-index information and DOST-described iHeatMAP. Local protocol: Local thresholds, offline channels, current duty roster and financed protective actions not verified. DOST iHeatMAP service explanation (opens in a new tab) ↗
Rules for heat at work: National reference: RA 11058 for covered private-sector workplaces; verify current advisory text and applicability before using operational rules. City specific rule: Not verified Republic Act 11058, occupational safety and health (opens in a new tab) ↗ · PMAP circulation of DOLE signed advisory 20-2026 (opens in a new tab) ↗
Cooling and buildings: National reference: Philippine Green Building Code applies to qualifying buildings; local permit and current appliance requirements require checking. City specific requirements: 2025 city code launch reported; full operative ordinance not reviewed. Philippine Green Building Code 2015 original document via ADB (opens in a new tab) ↗ · QC Green Building Code launch (opens in a new tab) ↗
Money for protection: Potential routes: Approved LGU budgets and eligible adaptation project routes, subject to legal/appraisal conditions; no heat earmark inferred. CCC People’s Survival Fund (opens in a new tab) ↗ · DILG 2026 legal opinion on LDRRMF purposes (opens in a new tab) ↗
Costs: Currency: PHP Note: No comparable local lifecycle cost quote verified. No USD or FX conversion is invented; a fund envelope is not a unit intervention cost.
Gaps in what we found:
- Selection reflects documented heat response and urban risk, not a claim that QC has the highest current national index.
- Neighbourhood indoor/night exposure, disability access, wage protection and recurring maintenance cost require verification.
Known, inferred, uncertain: Known: City sources document recent heat-action governance and a library cooling-centre offer. Inferred: The proposed entry point follows from the documented exposure/response evidence. Uncertain: Current operational readiness, effects, local adoption, reach and costs.
Region: National Capital Region
Selection basis: City sources document recent heat-action governance and a library cooling-centre offer.
Selection not a rank: true
Evidence:
Notable programme ids:
- ph-qc-team
- ph-qc-cooling
- ph-qc-green
- ph-c40
Local actors verified:
Proposed collaboration entry: A potential place to study warning, public cooling, health surveillance, building policy and operating budgets together.
Dagupan
Heat context: Humid tropical heat with seasonal/local variation; indoor, night and worksite conditions need local measurements.
Official heat plan: Detail: A final adopted city heat action plan, legal instrument and itemised recurring budget were not verified in this review. This does not establish absence.
Agencies responsible: Mandated route: City/LGU DRRM planning arrangements under RA 10121, plus health, schools, planning/engineering, utilities and employers within their own mandates. Local delivery limit: Specific local commitments outside the documented examples are proposed routes, not verified operational assignments. Republic Act 10121, disaster management law (opens in a new tab) ↗
Warnings: Verified national route: PAGASA heat-index information and DOST-described iHeatMAP. Local protocol: Local thresholds, offline channels, current duty roster and financed protective actions not verified. DOST iHeatMAP service explanation (opens in a new tab) ↗
Rules for heat at work: National reference: RA 11058 for covered private-sector workplaces; verify current advisory text and applicability before using operational rules. City specific rule: Not verified Republic Act 11058, occupational safety and health (opens in a new tab) ↗ · PMAP circulation of DOLE signed advisory 20-2026 (opens in a new tab) ↗
Cooling and buildings: National reference: Philippine Green Building Code applies to qualifying buildings; local permit and current appliance requirements require checking. City specific requirements: Not verified Philippine Green Building Code 2015 original document via ADB (opens in a new tab) ↗
Money for protection: Potential routes: Approved LGU budgets and eligible adaptation project routes, subject to legal/appraisal conditions; no heat earmark inferred. CCC People’s Survival Fund (opens in a new tab) ↗ · DILG 2026 legal opinion on LDRRMF purposes (opens in a new tab) ↗
Costs: Currency: PHP Note: No comparable local lifecycle cost quote verified. No USD or FX conversion is invented; a fund envelope is not a unit intervention cost.
Gaps in what we found:
- A five-day station series is insufficient to establish annual citywide exposure rank.
- Neighbourhood indoor/night exposure, disability access, wage protection and recurring maintenance cost require verification.
Known, inferred, uncertain: Known: PAGASA’s archived March 2026 computed heat-index summary includes the Dagupan station; this provides a recent regional heat-information case. Inferred: The proposed entry point follows from the documented exposure/response evidence. Uncertain: Current operational readiness, effects, local adoption, reach and costs.
Region: Pangasinan, Luzon
Selection basis: PAGASA’s archived March 2026 computed heat-index summary includes the Dagupan station; this provides a recent regional heat-information case.
Selection not a rank: true
Evidence:
Proposed collaboration entry: Investigate forecast-to-action, exposed market/work settings and water/power continuity with local authorities.
Tuguegarao
Heat context: Humid tropical heat with seasonal/local variation; indoor, night and worksite conditions need local measurements.
Official heat plan: Detail: A final adopted city heat action plan, legal instrument and itemised recurring budget were not verified in this review. This does not establish absence.
Agencies responsible: Mandated route: City/LGU DRRM planning arrangements under RA 10121, plus health, schools, planning/engineering, utilities and employers within their own mandates. Local delivery limit: Specific local commitments outside the documented examples are proposed routes, not verified operational assignments. Republic Act 10121, disaster management law (opens in a new tab) ↗
Warnings: Verified national route: PAGASA heat-index information and DOST-described iHeatMAP. Local protocol: Local thresholds, offline channels, current duty roster and financed protective actions not verified. DOST iHeatMAP service explanation (opens in a new tab) ↗
Rules for heat at work: National reference: RA 11058 for covered private-sector workplaces; verify current advisory text and applicability before using operational rules. City specific rule: Not verified Republic Act 11058, occupational safety and health (opens in a new tab) ↗ · PMAP circulation of DOLE signed advisory 20-2026 (opens in a new tab) ↗
Cooling and buildings: National reference: Philippine Green Building Code applies to qualifying buildings; local permit and current appliance requirements require checking. City specific requirements: Not verified Philippine Green Building Code 2015 original document via ADB (opens in a new tab) ↗
Money for protection: Potential routes: Approved LGU budgets and eligible adaptation project routes, subject to legal/appraisal conditions; no heat earmark inferred. CCC People’s Survival Fund (opens in a new tab) ↗ · DILG 2026 legal opinion on LDRRMF purposes (opens in a new tab) ↗
Costs: Currency: PHP Note: No comparable local lifecycle cost quote verified. No USD or FX conversion is invented; a fund envelope is not a unit intervention cost.
Gaps in what we found:
- Airport/station conditions are not representative of every neighbourhood or building.
- Neighbourhood indoor/night exposure, disability access, wage protection and recurring maintenance cost require verification.
Known, inferred, uncertain: Known: CAAP identifies Tuguegarao among heat-affected airport locations; PIA documents a local school response in 2024. Inferred: The proposed entry point follows from the documented exposure/response evidence. Uncertain: Current operational readiness, effects, local adoption, reach and costs.
Region: Cagayan, Luzon
Selection basis: CAAP identifies Tuguegarao among heat-affected airport locations; PIA documents a local school response in 2024.
Selection not a rank: true
Evidence:
Notable programme ids:
Proposed collaboration entry: Build on the documented school-response experience to examine classroom conditions, continuity and household impacts.
Cotabato City
Heat context: Humid tropical heat with seasonal/local variation; indoor, night and worksite conditions need local measurements.
Official heat plan: Detail: A final adopted city heat action plan, legal instrument and itemised recurring budget were not verified in this review. This does not establish absence.
Agencies responsible: Mandated route: City/LGU DRRM planning arrangements under RA 10121, plus health, schools, planning/engineering, utilities and employers within their own mandates. Local delivery limit: Specific local commitments outside the documented examples are proposed routes, not verified operational assignments. Republic Act 10121, disaster management law (opens in a new tab) ↗
Warnings: Verified national route: PAGASA heat-index information and DOST-described iHeatMAP. Local protocol: Local thresholds, offline channels, current duty roster and financed protective actions not verified. DOST iHeatMAP service explanation (opens in a new tab) ↗
Rules for heat at work: National reference: RA 11058 for covered private-sector workplaces; verify current advisory text and applicability before using operational rules. City specific rule: Not verified Republic Act 11058, occupational safety and health (opens in a new tab) ↗ · PMAP circulation of DOLE signed advisory 20-2026 (opens in a new tab) ↗
Cooling and buildings: National reference: Philippine Green Building Code applies to qualifying buildings; local permit and current appliance requirements require checking. City specific requirements: Not verified Philippine Green Building Code 2015 original document via ADB (opens in a new tab) ↗
Money for protection: Potential routes: Approved LGU budgets and eligible adaptation project routes, subject to legal/appraisal conditions; no heat earmark inferred. CCC People’s Survival Fund (opens in a new tab) ↗ · DILG 2026 legal opinion on LDRRMF purposes (opens in a new tab) ↗
Costs: Currency: PHP Note: No comparable local lifecycle cost quote verified. No USD or FX conversion is invented; a fund envelope is not a unit intervention cost.
Gaps in what we found:
- A station extreme over a partial season is not citywide annual exposure or a measure of local response readiness.
- Neighbourhood indoor/night exposure, disability access, wage protection and recurring maintenance cost require verification.
Known, inferred, uncertain: Known: PAGASA’s April 2026 climate-forum presentation includes Cotabato City among high station heat-index observations during 1 March–21 April 2026. Inferred: The proposed entry point follows from the documented exposure/response evidence. Uncertain: Current operational readiness, effects, local adoption, reach and costs.
Region: Mindanao
Selection basis: PAGASA’s April 2026 climate-forum presentation includes Cotabato City among high station heat-index observations during 1 March–21 April 2026.
Selection not a rank: true
Evidence:
Proposed collaboration entry: Investigate local warning-to-action, health/school readiness and affordable protection with the relevant city and BARMM institutions.
Butuan City
Heat context: Humid tropical heat with seasonal/local variation; indoor, night and worksite conditions need local measurements.
Official heat plan: Detail: A final adopted city heat action plan, legal instrument and itemised recurring budget were not verified in this review. This does not establish absence.
Agencies responsible: Mandated route: City/LGU DRRM planning arrangements under RA 10121, plus health, schools, planning/engineering, utilities and employers within their own mandates. Local delivery limit: Specific local commitments outside the documented examples are proposed routes, not verified operational assignments. Republic Act 10121, disaster management law (opens in a new tab) ↗
Warnings: Verified national route: PAGASA heat-index information and DOST-described iHeatMAP. Local protocol: Local thresholds, offline channels, current duty roster and financed protective actions not verified. DOST iHeatMAP service explanation (opens in a new tab) ↗
Rules for heat at work: National reference: RA 11058 for covered private-sector workplaces; verify current advisory text and applicability before using operational rules. City specific rule: Not verified Republic Act 11058, occupational safety and health (opens in a new tab) ↗ · PMAP circulation of DOLE signed advisory 20-2026 (opens in a new tab) ↗
Cooling and buildings: National reference: Philippine Green Building Code applies to qualifying buildings; local permit and current appliance requirements require checking. City specific requirements: Not verified Philippine Green Building Code 2015 original document via ADB (opens in a new tab) ↗
Money for protection: Potential routes: Approved LGU budgets and eligible adaptation project routes, subject to legal/appraisal conditions; no heat earmark inferred. CCC People’s Survival Fund (opens in a new tab) ↗ · DILG 2026 legal opinion on LDRRMF purposes (opens in a new tab) ↗
Costs: Currency: PHP Note: No comparable local lifecycle cost quote verified. No USD or FX conversion is invented; a fund envelope is not a unit intervention cost.
Gaps in what we found:
- Historical computed heat-index extremes need method scrutiny; very high heat-index values are not literal air temperatures or current citywide readings.
- Neighbourhood indoor/night exposure, disability access, wage protection and recurring maintenance cost require verification.
Known, inferred, uncertain: Known: The same PAGASA presentation identifies Butuan among historical March–May station heat-index extremes, with the event dated 25 May 2020. Inferred: The proposed entry point follows from the documented exposure/response evidence. Uncertain: Current operational readiness, effects, local adoption, reach and costs.
Region: Agusan del Norte, Mindanao
Selection basis: The same PAGASA presentation identifies Butuan among historical March–May station heat-index extremes, with the event dated 25 May 2020.
Selection not a rank: true
Evidence:
Proposed collaboration entry: Investigate market/work protection and indoor/night measurements, alongside the legal and operating route for services.